Hacker News Reader

In my opinion the article is great meanwhile ChatGPT made 4 significant mistakes in a single sentence. “almost identical” “early humans” “, which suggests” and “searching for food”

I don’t think that says as much about the algorithm as way people are doing evaluations. So yes people might mistakenly use “early human” when describing what was around 3.3 to 1.6 million years ago but that doesn’t somehow make it correct to do so.

> I think a lot of humans might make the same mistakes

Indeed, it seems ChatGPT is not that much of an improvement over the current state of affairs. At least not in the realm of science journalism.

We don't need automatic mistake-makers, eh?