Then again, there aren't any (successful) leftist comedians left anymore.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodernism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Marxism#:~:text=Neo%2DMarx...).
Nope.
> who will resort to any rhetorical nonsense
Rhetoric t is literally the act of arguing. If it isn't fallacious it isn't nonsense, and I don't use fallacious reasoning.
> in order to gain social media points
Are you jealous that you don't have any?
> likely narcissistic traits
Maybe projecting a little?
- "post-modernism" - as in rejection of the values of enlightenment; rejection of reason, and ultimately rejection of the idea that there exist solutions to problems that can be discovered by people cooperating in good faith;
- "neo-Marxist" - a softer take on Marxism, less about bloody revolutions, more about hearts and minds; figures the class struggle is a spent topic for now, so it tries to create new social divisions to keep people motivated.
Also, if you're to believe Wikipedia entry[0], a label adopted by a group of people trying to subvert mental health institutions so they breed revolutionaries instead of healing people. I wish I was making that up...
EDIT: I'll just quote that last bit verbatim, the whole subheading on Wiki as it looks right now:
Neo-Marxist feminism
Some portions of Marxist feminism have used the neo-Marxist label.[16][17] This
school of thought believes that the means of knowledge, culture, and pedagogy
are part of a privileged epistemology. Neo-Marxist feminism relies heavily on
critical theory and seeks to apply those theories in psychotherapy as the means
of political and cultural change. Teresa McDowell and Rhea Almeida use these
theories in a therapy method called "liberation based healing," which, like many
other forms of Marxism, uses sample bias in the many interrelated liberties in
order to magnify the "critical consciousness" of the participants towards unrest
of the status quo.[17][18][19][20]
--[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Marxism#Neo-Marxist_femini...
Does that definition feel completely fuzzy, and seem to be no definition at all? I think so to. It hints at certain idea, but otherwise... every political ideology with a name is like it.