> In addition to potentially rescuing concepts like locality and realism, retrocausal models also open avenues of exploring a “time-symmetric” view of our universe, in which the laws of physics are the same regardless of whether time runs forward or backward.

Usually the fundamental laws are regarded as time symmetric already.

What does this mean: > Instead, retrocausal models suggest that there is a mechanism that allows circumstances in the future to correlate with past states.

Surely future states inevitably correlate with past states?

Perhaps it all makes sense but that article doesn't make a compelling case.