I think the pace of AI advances may turn these disruptions into long-term issues and not lead to employment growth.
Yes, ChatGPT can be a multiplier on human productivity. But that's assuming you can learn how to use it correctly. The author here seems to know how to scale the complexity of the prompts in such a way that they get meaningful output (a complete website). That sort of prompting is a skillset in itself.
The problem as I see it is: how long is that skillset relevant before an even more advanced LLM comes along, forcing you to re-learn how to interact with it. Now consider that the next advancement need not come from an LLM, but some entirely different system that doesn't work via prompts. That skilled prompter needs a new skillset.
Technological innovations of the past have always come slowly enough that people could learn and master them before something new came along. It seems like things are moving so quickly in the AI space that may no longer be true.
With all that said, an example that gives me hope is chess. The rise of chess AI's has not killed chess in any sense. The players of the last few years are actually much stronger than pre-AI. Can the best players in the world beat Stockfish or Alpha-Go? Not even close. And so far that hasn't mattered. People still prefer to watch two human players.