If the output of ChatGPT is not copyrightable because it is not created by a human, then it should follow that a human cannot be held accountable for what it generates.
if a pilot gave the airliner controls to a dog, we wouldn't blame the dog or its parents for crashing the plane
Judges are liable to be old, not very hip to technology, and incredibly suspicious of any argument that would allow someone to opt out of traditional culpability by adding with an AI to the end of a description of traditional wrong doing.
Isn't compiler output copyrightable?
Not by the compiler vendor.