Hacker News Reader

Comment by willis936 | Hacker News Reader

If an environment is safe for humans, then it's safe for machines. Unfortunately this is a pretty high bar to clear and shows like the Expanse greatly undersell just how hard it will be to thrive on non-Earth locations in the solar system.

View on HN

Machines can be a lot more fragile than humans though, mainly due to cost reasons. NAND flash memory chips now routinely code three or four symbols into each buried gate, which means that even a very slight disturbance can change its state. Without error correction (like most consumer hardware and software), it can cause real issues.

And there is ECC in every level of cache in every CPU and often on main memory. TMR is for radiation environments unsafe for humans.

Not sure if I understood your comment correctly, but there is certainly not ECC in every CPU and main memory. The majority of RAM sticks you can buy do not support ECC. The NXP i.MX 8 application processors and Raspberry Pis that I was using do not support ECC memory. Also, all Cortex-M MCUs older than Cortex-M7 have no ECC in the core, and even with Cortex-M7 it is an optional extension used by STM32H7 but not NXP i.MX RT1160, 1060, 1050, etc

Not at all. Try running your laptop on the ISS. You won't get far. Source: ran code on non-hardened commercial servers on ISS.

I don't know what you've done but that information is not correct. Standard iPads and ThinkPad laptops are used on ISS. The problem on ISS is not ionising radiation but that in zero gravity cooling by convection does not work anywhere near as well as on Earth. Without forced air circulation they just sit in a bubble of hot air.

I ran a bunch of code on standard servers lifted onto iss. Eventually we couldn't because the machines broke. I never said anything about radiation (but I was probably thinking that), just that this case refutes GPs claim that anywhere a human is safe, a computer is too.

I was wrong about ThinkPads, and I'm fine being wrong about that since ThinkPads are surprisingly robust.

Aren't humans already reasonable radiation hard? Cells are full of error correction. I would have thought with greater tolerance than an off the shelf chip.

I'm being rather vague with my defitions admittedly.

Yes, we are "reasonable radiation hard" optimised for the conditions on earth and the quite low radiation we get here.

But even so, cancer is a real threat, so increase radiation dosis and you will increase cancer rates. Along with long term dna damages and other perks.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com