They were willing to spend whatever it took to provide reliable WiFi throughout the ~20 acre property. Equipment cost was concern #4 or #5.
We still went with gigabit fixtures and not 2.5G. The ISPs were only providing a 200mbps pipe (symmetrical), intra-LAN communication is not super common in this type of deployment, and no client devices currently on-property supported 2.5G.
So, yeah, for us, it still made sense to go with gigabit. Even when we look out over the next 5 years (expected lifetime of this new equipment) we didn't see the need for 2.5G growing _that much_.
I’ve been under the impression that there are patents (expiring soon) keeping the cost of 10G hardware high enough to prevent it from becoming the default choice. I don’t have a concrete source for that info though.