If you're still using it in 2023 you have only yourself to blame. It's not like there aren't better options at your disposal...
If you're still using it in 2023 you have only yourself to blame. It's not like there aren't better options at your disposal...
Edit: When I started writing the response, parent had no replies. I didn't mean to dogpile.
- Work apps that weren't compatible
- Awful screen tearing issues
- Bluetooth dropping out (mouse) and glitching (audio) all the time
- Games didn't work (and you can't screenshare with audio on Linux in Discord)
I'm sure I could have fixed these but after getting to the third page of Google looking how to solve a problem it was just easier to go back to Windows which I've (touch wood) never had stability problems with, it just works. I've never had it automatically update in the middle of the day, install apps that I didn't want by itself or delete any of my files.
It boggles my mind how someone can have the opposite experience.
Were you dual booting Windows and Linux?
Linux assumes and sets the system clock to UTC, while Windows assumes and sets the system clock to local timezone. This quite often leads to one of the two incorrectly determining the time because of an incorrect assumption.
As for my personal experience, Linux is cursed. The thing breaks down if I so much as look at it weird; I don't trust anything mission critical to it anymore.
Windows, besides being practical and versatile and customizable, has been a paragon of reliability for me. Even Windows ME performed admirably for me way back in the day; no, I'm not joking.
It's actually ^this^ perspective that most fits the "daytime television" analogy. The old fogies have precisely that attitude, and they're primarily who still watch daytime TV.
Now that most of the population aims their eyeballs at something other than TV, TV has become a wasteland of geriatric-targeted ads/political propaganda (old people vote) with a pittance of content mixed in. It's being stripped clean of what flesh remains, in its final death throes until its remaining viewers completely die off.
MS Windows is on the same trajectory, which started with MS failing to get Windows on smartphones. Now that so many grow up using non-Windows mobile devices instead of home PCs, Windows will only become increasingly desperate, dated, and tasteless in its revenue/power-generating schemes.
Hopefully FLOSS can prove more robust against this cycle... It's not like we don't see similar patterns emerging with Mozilla embedding ads/"suggestions" in Firefox tabs, or Canonical putting ads in Ubuntu. But at least there will always be alternatives thanks to the ability to fork and compete when the source is available.
The sunken cost fallacy applies IMHO, but too many corporate IT managers just assume Windows systems and Windows AD is the the only way to manage a large set of corporate users.
What do you recommend? I wouldn't try to manage an org of over 1k people without AD, it's just a nightmare.
But yeah, mouse scroll speed is an excellent example of the harm GNOME does to GNU/Linux adoption.
gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.background picture-options 'none'
gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.background primary-color '#004000'
gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.background secondary-color '#306030'
gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.background color-shading-type 'vertical'
Source: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1272120/ubuntu-20-04-change-...As long as that's how it goes, it will never be the Year of the Linux Desktop.
But as long as there is a conversation between Windows and Linux that includes using the terminal, you've lost the "normie" segment of the population, which is going to preclude most people from even considering it.
This fact is invariably met with much wailing and gnashing of teeth by Linux bros who think that there's no problem at all with it.
They can suffer Windows or MacOS, it means nothing to me.
It is right there ready to use.
For what exactly? For many, many things, windows is your ONLY option. Switching to Linux or Apple would mean kissing away so much software availability.