So, to summarize, your point is "this was art that I don't like made by people I don't like so it's ok to destroy."
That about it?
That about it?
In other words, they are not art, they are spam. They have more in common with hustlebros spamming T-shirt and poster sites with AI-generated images than they do with art.
I see, you get to decide what's art then?
How could that possibly go awry...
These Roman artifacts were mass produced by a slave owning nation too [1], probably ought to be destroyed along with the statues too, I guess.
[1] https://ancientimes.blogspot.com/2009/05/ct-scans-reveal-rom...
Or would you argue that their beliefs are wrong, and yours are right, so it's ok then?
Pretty sure they'd make a similar argument.
Or we could just... not destroy things?
[1] https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/history-and-civilisatio...
So like a Nazi furry Funko pop, we can't get rid of that.
Cool strawman! Here, I can do it too:
Why do you feel the need to be the ministry of truth and right-think, destroying and silencing anything that violates your "modern" sensibilities, regardless of it's historical significance?