Yes, not everything is worth preserving. Space and resources are limited.
Or would you argue that their beliefs are wrong, and yours are right, so it's ok then?
Pretty sure they'd make a similar argument.
Or we could just... not destroy things?
[1] https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/history-and-civilisatio...
So like a Nazi furry Funko pop, we can't get rid of that.
Cool strawman! Here, I can do it too:
Why do you feel the need to be the ministry of truth and right-think, destroying and silencing anything that violates your "modern" sensibilities, regardless of it's historical significance?