As long as training data is generated by experts then experts cannot be supplanted, such is my theory.
I mean, maybe AGI will be capable in the future, but I don't see a LLM doing that.
Experts are required, at least for now, to advance the body of knowledge.
Anyway, the thinking is that humans take so long to learn that we can't master two or more disciplines, and there's useful stuff in the gaps between disciplines that's actually quite easy to discover for even a simple AI model if it can be taught enough.
It's not quite the same as extrapolating General Relativity, but it could be a case where AI advances the body of knowledge.