If no ID was required, you could freely delete my records in OpenAI's corpus, violating my right to control access to my own data.
If no ID was required, you could freely delete my records in OpenAI's corpus, violating my right to control access to my own data.
If that's the way you choose to look at it, perhaps you could argue that the system should be opt-in, rather than opt-out. Maybe you should have to provide ID to grant access, instead of letting your identity be exploited for profit implicitly.
If someone wrote your name on a wall and I asked them to erase it, I don't think that violates your rights. You didn't ask for OpenAI to train on your data in the first place. Having it deleted now is no different than OpenAI never having existed in the first place.
"Hi, I am $competitor, and I want all information about my successes scrubbed from the internet. Thank you."
However, Google didn't want to be considered a news platform, because otherwise they'd be held responsible for their content. So you can't ask CNN to remove the article themselves, but you can (and people do) ask Google to remove those article from search results.
If I used Spotify and anyone could delete my data (playlists for example) that would be quite annoying.
Chances are quite good that there exist people who you would be unhappy with me ensuring are deleted from Wikipedia, for instance.
You have no right to make someone forget me.
Unless we're talking about something other than GDPR, this same situation would apply to online services, not just training AI datasets.