Her wealth was all on paper, that paper being equity in Theranos. By the time she was indicted her net worth was listed as zero.
Perhaps she'll sell us a biography. But how can anyone believe any story coming from Elizabeth Holmes. She has some serious credibility problems.
The sentencing judge believed her when she said she bought a one way ticket to Mexico after she was convicted to attend a friend's wedding, not to flee from incarceration.
I believe the judge also referred to her as "brilliant", omitting the words "con artist".
Genuinely unsure how US law works in this scenario. If the assets are in her husbands name, and are clearly not proceeds of the Theranos saga, can they be seized? (Especially given that they came into her life after all of this).
My assumption would have been that she’d essentially remain penniless in her own name until after any limitations of claims had expired (20 years I believe from elsewhere in the thread) and the debt had been written off.
Also does she spend the 11 years in jail or is it a half in/half out thing? I imagine there’s a lot of ways this still gets argued down to a much shorter time period but admittedly IANAL.