Hacker News Reader

It would probably cost a lot more to evict Twitter and find a new commercial tenant than it does to compel them to pay rent.

The reason this wouldn’t apply to you is that residential real estate vacancies are usually easy to fill, especially nowadays.

View on HN

> The reason this wouldn’t apply to you

That remains to be established. People often have no idea what renter protections are like. If he's in California, he might find that he can't be evicted without the landlord going through a multi-year process.

Take years, or even a year, is very much hyperbole, even for SF. Particularly when dealing with non-paying tenants. This may have been different during eviction moratoriums at the height of the pandemic.

The eviction moratorium is still active in SF, Oakland and Berkeley.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com