And what does that mean in this situation? The using of a historical analogy in a legal opinion contributes to making our government have the appearance of a dictatorship?
Just a general trend of humanizing things that aren't human: governments, corporations, AI.
The opinion in this case prevented a "evil" government entity from taking an individual's property unjustly, and was written by a person using anecdotes and references to people. So honestly I don't know what you're on about.