Example?
"Which political party has had the most politicians convicted of crimes in the last 50 years?"
"According to a comparison of 28 years each of Democratic and Republican administrations from 1961-2016, Republicans scored eighteen times more individuals and entities indicted, thirty-eight times more convictions, and thirty-nine times more individuals who had prison time1. Is there anything else you would like to know?"
Oh wait, that's not bias. The Republican Party demonstrably has a higher number of its members convicted of crime. Simply put, Republican politicians are much more likely to commit crimes than Democrat politicians.
Reality has a well known liberal bias.
> According to a comparison of 28 years > 1961-2016
edit: looks like bing pulled it answers from: https://medium.com/rantt/gop-admins-had-38-times-more-crimin...
Talking of bias - this is used the world over..
Over the past decade social media has nurtured a culture where reality is whatever you choose to believe
I know the language is "choose your reality" and I'm not saying you're wrong, but I think we could acknowledge that's not really what's happening. Folks don't get to decide facts, they decide what facts they believe. That decision doesn't invalidate those facts.