What's interesting is they're marketing 4K for each eyes, which I assume means that a display taking a third of the vision area would have a third a third of that resolution to display text etc. That's not unworkable, but we currently already have actual 4K monitors, only for a screen, and having two 4K monitors on a table should give an uncomparatively sharper image than what the headset is offering at best.
Basically, a 4K resolution per eye is impressive, but actually not that much to work with if we're comparing it to real world equivalents.
You want to replace your monitors, with a VR headset? What's the appeal?
The cost see very high for something that has no apparent use case, I mean, Disney+ ... that's the best use they can come up with.
I don't think this is there yet. I'd need to see performance data, and I'd really prefer SteamVR integration (though I could probably reduce a PC+headset to a pretty small if necessary). But it's a step in that direction, and even if it's not necessarily Apple that gets there I think we will see that kind of device in the future.