Hacker News Reader

Would you care to explain what you mean?

I meant 40B Falcon is better than 65B LLaMA in many benchmarks and we will see even better models released with time.

What is wrong with that?

That is fair, your post left it a bit ambiguous if you meant better in reference to GPT-4 or not.

Competitors aren't even at GPT 3.5.

When I use ChatGPT, I find anything but GPT4 unusable; when I'm programming against the API, I actually tend to find myself using GPT3.5. I still haven't had a chance to experiment with the opensource LLMs, but that's my project for next month.

I have preferred GPT3.5. GPT4 is slow and verbose, I only resort to this model when all my prompts in 3.5 didn't give the expected result.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com