Pretty sure the title is wrong and that it isnt a US Standard... Pretty sure CCS is though.
The Bloomberg article is describing a defacto USA Standard while omitting the word "defacto":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_facto_standard
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_facto
If NACS outnumbers CCS enough in marketshare, it will become a defacto standard and everybody in conversational usage will just call it a "standard" instead of "defacto standard".
Whether that threshold has actually been reached and NACS is truly a defacto standard today may be debated.
ccs is government funded, tesla “nacs” is not. if you want tesla to be standard, sure. open it up, get all automakers on board, dont charge royalties, and let’s see.
it’s so asinine that NA and ROW will have different ac and dc charging. why cant we just have one global standard? preferably one not controlled by a rich megalomaniac
So NACS is beating CSS roughly 3:1, but J1772 still outnumbers NACS something like 5:1.
Looks like there are around 4000 Tesla Destination Chargers in the US; that shifts the numbers to more like 32:7:2 for J1772:NACS:CSS.
In the conversation of NACS versus CSS, J1772 shouldn't even be part of the conversation. It's simply not relevant.
CSS is a fraction of the US fast chargers; NACS is a fraction of the total US EV chargers.
NACS is used by 2/3rds of the existing BEV fleet; CSS/J1772 is used by 2/3rds of the existing plug-in EV fleet.
Is Intel not allowed to call USB4 a standard?
> ccs is government funded, tesla “nacs” is not.
Are USB or PCIe government funded? Are they not standards either?
> if you want tesla to be standard, sure. open it up, get all automakers on board, dont charge royalties, and let’s see.
Didn't Tesla already do those things? (Assuming you meant "some other" instead of "all", because if you didn't, then USB-C wouldn't be a standard either since iPhones don't use it.)