Hacker News Reader

>where the AI system poses a significant risk of harm to the health

We've seen pushes from both sides to redefine anything they disagree with as harmful to mental health.

The AI Act EXPLICITLY enumerates all use cases that will be considered 'high-risk' (Annex III). If your use case is not on the list (or on the 'prohibited' list), then you're good to go. There's no mechanism where someone opposed to your model can argue you should be high-risk because of supposed harms perceived or dreamt-up by some political group. (Caveat: The list of high-risk use cases will probably be able to be amended by the Commission unilaterally after the regulation is enacted.)

Both sides of what?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com