It's starting multiple minutes.
You're supposed to "compile" it, creating your own image, hosting it somewhere (and it's huge). And then this "compiled" image will be fast. Well, fast in Java terms.
It's starting multiple minutes.
You're supposed to "compile" it, creating your own image, hosting it somewhere (and it's huge). And then this "compiled" image will be fast. Well, fast in Java terms.
I was shocked when I read the instructions and realized I had to build a secondary container.
On top of this, there are some keycloak options (parameters and env vars) which are valid only at the time of compiling a new container, where others are valid only at runtime
Anyway, they changed the default behavior a few releases ago. In the past you had to pass --auto-build to avoid having to build, but now the default behavior is to auto build. If you instead want to optimize you have to do extra steps: https://www.keycloak.org/server/configuration
Starting a few minutes? It looks like there must be some DNS problem somewhere. Or maybe it's the download build time? In any case, I'd measure the second startup time.
Java can be blazingly fast if done right. (And C++ can be stupidly slow if done wrong.)
Those services were all built to not be restarted so they've never optimized for it. More recent Java frameworks and projects do try to optimize restarts due to kubernetes adoption etc.
You may have have seen those magical Java applications that both implement a decent amount of functionality (so not just a toy), and start in a couple of seconds, but the rest of us will believe it when we see it.
I wonder how they're developed, it feels like a throwback to the punch-card era.
While I don't have much love for Microsoft, you should take a look at dotnet. Applications written on top of dotnet (even using massive frameworks like ASP.NET + EF) actually do start in a few seconds, which is at least an order of magnitude faster than anything similar in Java.