Read any old book on photography printing. If it is new enough to mention DPI, it insists at 300 for amateur prints.
That is not an entirely fair comparison, most print techniques are inherently less crisp because dots (pixels) tend to bleed into each other.
Oh, right. Now I have no clue how these numbers compare. But indeed they’re definitely not apples to apples.
I don't have a definite reference for anything between 185 and 217, but it is a big difference visually. Somewhere in that range, the pixels disappear at a reasonable viewing distance.