Please explain how Henry Wade could enforce the overturned Texas Penal Code statutes without violating the constitutional right to privacy.
Where is the right to privacy in the Constitution, btw? Sounds like the whole thing is legislating from the bench! Maybe we should bring back Lochner-style scrutiny of minimum wage laws under a newly-discovered "right to earn a living"?
People inevitably making this argument was actually the primary argument against adopting a Bill of Rights at all, and the Ninth Amendment was the compromise solution to have some enumerated rights while hoping to negate this exact argument.