The point the commenter is making is that they asked for $120,000/year, but the recruiter thought that was too much hearing "120" as a per-hour rate, so countered with $90/hour. Hilarity ensues. The OP got more than they were asking for because of the ambiguity.
I sometimes joke that, when contracting, I spend 80% of my time billing work for client projects and the other 80% (unpaid) getting new projects, leaving me only 80% (unpaid) of my time to spend managing relationships with clients and collaborators, doing taxes, and maintaining the existing business.
Also consider your retirement savings and what you're missing out on from employer 401k matches.
Finally, keep an eye on cost of living and adjust your rate accordingly. The dollar is worth at least 20% less than it was 3 years ago. Charge 20% more.
- 80 hours federal holidays
- 160 hours PTO
- 240 hours (6 weeks) to find another job or contract.
But this was also considering both a w2 contract job working through an agency and my wife worked part time in the school system for benefits. If it was a 1099 contract, I would have to consider self employment tax.
I had a great network of recruiters between 2012-2018 when I was going back and forth between contract and permanent positions and the local development market was hot for your standard enterprise DEVs with experience.
e.g. $31/hr ≈ $62k/yr
To turn things the other way, take the annual wage in thousands (e.g. $80k), divide it by 2 (e.g. $40k) and chop off the thousands (e.g. $40).
e.g. $72k/yr ≈ $36/hr
So in the story, OP was making ~$52.50/hr and wanted to make ~$60/hr, but the recruiter thought they wanted ~$120/hr but could only get them ~$90/hr. Not too shabby.
Life-hack: take your hourly rate, multiply by two, add three zeroes.
90 * 2 = 180. 180 + 000 = 180k.
That assumes: - 40 hour work week - 50 weeks / year (2 weeks vacation)
That’s not taking into account W2 vs 1099 and if it’s a contract the lack of health care, 401K matching, company paid unemployment funding, time between contracts, etc.