So, I am working on an e-book reader myself and I love e-books as well. But the problem with e-books is not that they don't have "smell or feel" but rather DRM issues. Unless you get all your books in a DRM-free e-pub format, they can be taken out of your library at any time for any reason. Also its nice to have something to pass down from generation to generation.
I am personally an avid supporter of both digital and physical books, but to say that physical books are an "inferior" choice is incorrect because people choose those for entirely different reasons than they might choose a digital copy.
Most of the time it is actually easier to find a copy of a DRM free book on Anna's Archive than it is to find a DRM copy...
This is more an argument against DRM than it is against ebooks.
My complaints about DRM aside, my biggest problem with OPs article on e-books is thinking that one is "superior" to another, when different people get different formats for different reasons. Some may like the idea of being able to carry tons of books around with them on a tablet, or being able to search text. Others might dislike these features, and prefer physically turning pages. Neither is "better" than the other, and I dislike people that DO think one or the other is inherently superior for whatever reasons.
And psychedelics are fun (in moderation). Try some, they might expand your mind a little.
https://www.npostart.nl/drugslab-afl-5-bastiaan-snuift-ketam...
"Every person on the planet should have their own website" probably qualifies if the beholder's eye is over the age of 20.