Hard disagree. I worked with Pascal for about 10 years, and the lack of modern libraries was a source of frequent frustration, meaning we often had to develop the solutions ourselves, or abandon an idea entirely.
Naturally one had to be willing to pay for them.
I guess JavaScript is out then. ;-)
Our lead developer was interested in building a RabbitMQ prototype. There were two libraries around to find, but none of them were finished, so we spent a lot of time finishing one of those implementations. We also looked into ProtoBuf, but that was a steeper hill to climb. When I left in early 2019, we were still using the old WinSock communication, though I understand from former co-workers, that they've switch to an UDP-based system instead now.
That's the most vivid one I can remember, because we pushed on, despite the available libraries being weak. I also remember trying MongoDB, which required a lot of polishing the available libraries as well. Other ideas I remember pursuing briefly, until I recognised finished some of the libraries would be too tall an order.
For the record, I don't have a problem with Pascal in general, nor its community. But considering how trivial it is to find a solid robust library for modern technologies (even if kind of fads) for other popular languages, compared to Pascal, it definitely feels weird to call its ecosystem "great".
Of course, the libraries I've mentioned may be great today. But RabbitMQ and MongoDB are also a bit older technologies today.