An anti-competitive Microsoft conglomerate to compete with PS# is hardly going to better for consumers than a Nintendo-Sony duopoly.
I’d rather we don’t allow bad M&As, even for good reasons.
I’d rather we don’t allow bad M&As, even for good reasons.
It competes like a Honda Civic competes with a Chevrolet Corvette.
Both in 2017:
7:13.9 - Chevrolet Corvette C7 Z06 Christian Gebhardt.
7:43.8 - Civic Type R, Honda didn't name the driver.
Having said that the Nintendo Switch competes against the Series X in my home for time. It has some seriously good titles that my son loves to play.
https://www.motortrend.com/news/2023-honda-civic-type-r-nurb...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_Civic_Type_R
I eventually ended up with an electric car instead (Tesla LR3), but spent hours looking at this - and the Subaru WRX.
Thank you!
Quality of games doesn't matter so much. If someone is spending hours playing Tears of the Kingdom, that's time not spent on playing games on another console.
Even with your analogy there will be some people who can afford 2 cars and drive them for different occasions but others only dedicate to just one. And even then a person can only drive one car at a time.
That's not true. Both sides have made handhelds as well as full gaming consoles.
Just because Nintendo's current focus is the handheld switch and Sony dropped their handheld for now doesn't mean things won't change.