Luckily the original data from that day is available, so you can see [1] that the actual temperatures recorded in Zaragoza and several other cities nearby were far from that extreme temperature.

Other Spanish newspapers reported the extreme temperature as taken in the sun [2], and also included the temperature in the shade with a more reasonable value.

1: https://repositorio.aemet.es/handle/20.500.11765/6290

2: http://hemeroteca.lavanguardia.com/preview/1935/06/23/pagina...

Great, that's sloppy, probably sensationalist reporting. What does that have to do with science?

Also what's your evidence that this is fraud and not just a mistake?

Also, oddly enough, wikipedia doesn't know anything about a 1935 heat record: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_extreme_temperatures_i...

Perhaps, that tiny story, never discussed anywhere else as far as I can find, and not reported locally, involved a typo of some kind?

Are you suggesting a massive world wide conspiracy based on that tiny single article?

What is causing atmospheric CO2 to increase? What do you think is going to happen if that keeps increasing?

The only remaining coherent arguments against climate change our the fact that some reports and conclusions were exaggerated in order to drum up public concern. There are no actual arguments against it remaining, just legitimate but completely distracting arguments about how the research and communication was carried out.