Arguments in the first part are really bad. I haven't read about ai safety that much, but still see it.

For example, ASI may be able to automate manufacturing really quickly, maybe be able to convince humans easily to do what it needs, etc Moreover, why ai would not be competing with us for resources? Materials on earth are finite.

Also, most likely scenario is not evil AGI, as it outlined in the article, but indifferent. And basing reasoning about AI on Darwinian evolution is barely useful.

Also, talk about this tribal people AI is ironically even worse then silicon valley narrow viewpoint: it is Californian liberal virtue signaling.