Hacker News Reader

Comment by nomat | Hacker News Reader

[flagged]

No. You can't argue with what I said, it's a fact. Facts just are. You can argue about what it means if you want, or how it makes you feel.

you keep saying that but your set of facts is clearly missing many pieces (you admit as much) so to keep repeating it doesn't make it any more true and is really revealing a lot.

You can't make a fact more true. It simply is.

You can drop the personal attacks and insinuations. That's not necessary.

It’s not really a personal attack to point out that your “just asking questions” routine happens to dovetail nicely with certain political talking points. Why so defensive?

Why don't you name the pieces of facts that are missing then so the parent can respond to it?

You keep making personal attacks and asking if the parent is employed by the state of Florida. What does their employment situation have to do with anything?

That was a different person, although your point is valid for the other person.

Ahh, I honestly don't pay attention to usernames. I replied to someone who is defending your attacker and making the same low effort quips so I assume they have no problem with the bizarre employment question or they would have flagged the comment or called it out for what it is.

This is also in rather poor taste.

To point you in the right direction: "to keep repeating it doesn't make it any more true and is really revealing a lot" of undesirable things about you as a person. The latter words added by me and implied. That's a personal attack.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com