There has been a good 20 years of climate hysteria to pull from. All one has to do is look at old newspapers and read the dire predictions from 2010 to have a good laugh at our sensational media.
However I wouldn't classify Nature as "sensational media", the authors of the original are a physicist and a mathematician from a well known University.
And I wouldn't call it hysteria when barely anything gets done for the actual climate at a nation state level.
To find environmental predictions that didn't happen try a google search for "Environmental Predictions that didn't happen", I promise you won't have to dig for results to find what you're looking for.
In the lists in various articles you'll find, notice that these predictions are often made by credentialed scientists from prestigious institutions, not an overhyped journalist making leaps from a scientific paper they don't understand.
One of biggest problem with the climate science is that it suffers from a selection bias. I think most people who go into that field already have their mind made up and their goal is to affirm their belief. And if they didn't, they'd be an unfunded nobody labeled a crackpot...as the skeptics/moderates often are.
I won't do you research for you. Try to find some examples, and you'll find that the scientific community has been correct. Or prove me wrong!