Fascism weaponizes history.
You clearly did not understand the intention of what I posted (criticism of the anti-Western attitude at the British Library), instead insisting on a perceived antipathy towards Muslims. If you follow the link I added the first thing you see is an explanation of how the page is not too be taken as criticism of a single religion.
Read it again and you might understand what I wrote and why. Don't forget to read the last few paragraphs which give context to what is written.
All that said I do consider it important that this part of history is not shovelled under the carpet just to appease a vocal group, especially not seen in the context of the constant stream of criticism of Western colonialism which tries to portray this as a specifically Western vice
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_under_the_Mongol_E...
Whereas the Mughals outright conquered India, moved there and lived in it for the next 400 years. Their kids lived and died in India. They cut of their ties with their brethren in Samarkand and more importantly did not take India's wealth outside of India. The fact is most historic Indian Jewels (i.e. Kohi noor) are locked up in London, not Samarkand.
Comparing the Mughals with the European colonizers is silly. The fact is Mughals became as Indian as the natives who lived there. They married locals and looked like them eventually. See the last picture of the Mughal emperor imprisoned by the British: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bahadur_Shah_Zafar#/media/File...
He looks like a dark skinned Indian Yogi.
Another thing to consider: had I posted something critical of some western coloniser instead of an islamic one it is unlikely there would have been any discussion on the subject as it is considered bon ton to do so - which goes straight back to my reason for posting in the first place.
[1] "The religious policy of the Mughal emperors", https://www.rarebooksocietyofindia.org/book_archive/19617421...
Which they've acknowledged, which makes it less of an accusation and far more a self evident uncontested fact.
On 3 June 1992 the High Court of Australia recognised that a group of Torres Strait Islanders, led by Eddie Mabo, held ownership of Mer (Murray Island). In acknowledging the traditional rights of the Meriam people to their land, the court also held that native title existed for all Indigenous people.
https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2017/06/02/five-...
I corrected your 'air quotes' doing the heavy work of sneeringly implied so called.
Stolen land is legally recognised as stolen, here in Australia at least, and is still stolen, where it has been stolen, about the globe.
Here, at least, "Western self-flagellating descendants" were hoisted by their own Crown legal system - they began by officially declaring the land Terra Nullus and then had to accept that either their legal framework going back to the Romans was up shit creek, OR, that they had no legal basis for that declaration and were forced to roll it back and admit theft.
You really need to catch up on history, barring the revisionist junk being preached by the ruling BJP in India. If the British Museum had led a display on Genghis Khan or Aurangzeb, that would have been in bad taste. But this is Babur for God sakes, about as cultured or docile a king could get in 16th century while still being a conqueror of India.
The ethnic hatred is not only everpresent, it is celebrated.