I’m sure I’ve seen that in some book.
Are things worse than what the IPCC is letting on? Absolutely, yes, but saying everyone's gona die from it is ridiculous. Most reading this will merely be inconvenienced. Some will lose houses to wildfires or hurricanes, but most will swealter a bit more than they would have otherwise.
The only people who really have to worry are those in the tropics living with unreliable power grids and no ac.
Except:
>The only people who really have to worry are those in the tropics living with unreliable power grids and no ac.
Which is where millions of people attempting to migrate to countries where living outside isn't a death sentence, and how do you think that will go after the amount of hatred we have seen for the comparatively minimal migration we have currently experienced?
Good luck turning away orders of magnitude more, fighting for a chance at life.
I think that 50 years from now the global average life expectancy will be greater than now. Certainly not decades less than today’s average.
Perfectly happy to wager money through augur or some other wonky long bet system as this seems like a total easy win.
First time for everything.
Civilization collapse = whenever the way a civilization is run, can't be sustained any longer.
Often worsened by a ruling elite only looking after themselves, while ignoring their societies' bigger problems. And sometimes (unexpected?) external events.
The "unsustainable" is pretty much a given right now.
So 'the ship has to be turned', quick.
Otherwise civilization collapse will (logically, inevitably) follow. Just like in past collapses. Only this time, global scale.
I prefer "turn ship around, quick" option over "widespread crop failures, chaos, wars, famine & other disasters".
Of course that’s an easy win. Nobody will come to collect if they win.