My contention that FP has no meaning gains another point of evidence.
As a Rust guy, I disagree. For one, Rust does not have lazy evaluation, just like C which is why I raised the point C is incompatible with FPP. Lazy evaluation in C (and Rust) can be emulated by function pointers (and closures), but it is not easy to use
> Rust does not have lazy evaluation
Does one need lazy evaluation to be FP?
Scheme isn't lazy to my knowledge.
I'm sure it would make a compiler's optimization job easier.