Hacker News Reader

I think they mean that the minimum hardware requirements just got a lot smaller.

Could you explain why? I might be looking at it a bit too naively, but how system build for running interpreted JavaScript apps can perform better than one designed for compiled ones?

It doesn't perform better. But at the low end, you don't need to bootstrap a java VM (like Android) just to check your email and browse the web etc. You can do the little things on less hardware.

No, but you have to bring along a whole browser just to interpret code that checks the mail...

Anyway you spin it the low end that can't manage android will never in a million years be able to run an "OS" in javascript. There is a reason they demo it on a SGSII ;)

They had another device running it which really was much worse then the SGSII, but with a much smaller screen it doesn't make for great video.

Dalvik being a bigger overhead than JägerMonkey?

Your comment should be sitting higher. Dalvik is unlikely to be more expensive than a similarly complex JS VM.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com