I don't know the details of the agreement (if any) between the Rust Foundation and Meneide, but if the Rust Foundation thinks that Meneide broke an agreement then I'll let them allege that. I don't know how much use there is to speculating about it.

In any case, the Rust Project has made it clear that they're not interested in the compile time reflection the way Shepherd's Oasis was doing it, so I'm not sure what use there would be in completing that work.

You seem to be jumping around in this conversation, unwilling to stick to one point. Earlier, it seemed like your main complaint was his conduct. When I challenged you on that, you didn't back that up, you jumped over to this grant money speculation. If your issue with him is that you suspect foul play regarding grant money, why didn't you lead with that? If your issue with him is his conduct, why didn't you attempt to make any arguments for why his conduct is problematic when challenged on it?