The "artists" seem to be as happy to abuse copyright as the corporations.
A license to do whatever the fuck they want? No. To do things other than make copies? Sure. Copyright is the right to copy, no more than that. Learning from something is not copying it. If you want to complain about memorisation, that’s fair. But learning from something is not something copyright was intended to restrict, so no, plenty of people absolutely will not care about copyright when it comes to this kind of thing, and rightly so.
$ llm -m 4 "Quote the declaration of independence:"
IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed...
(Note: The full text of the Declaration of Independence is quite lengthy, so I have included the most well-known portion here. The full text, including a list of grievances against King George III and the signatures of the signers, can be found elsewhere.)