Hacker News Reader

Pay for the Plus version.

Then it makes stuff up far less frequently.

If the next version has the same step up in performance, I will no longer consider inaccuracy an issue - even the best books have mistakes in them, they just need to be infrequent enough.

View on HN

> Pay for the Plus version.

> Then it makes stuff up far less frequently.

Now there's a business model for a ChatGPT-like service.

$1/month: Almost always wrong

$10/month: 50/50 chance of being right or wrong

$100/month: right 95% of the time

You make it sound like business shenanigans, but the truth is, it's a natural fit for now, as performance of LLMs improves with their size, but costs of training (up-front investment) and inference (marginal, per-query) also go up.

Pay for the $1/month version and invert the responses; now you have the $100/month one for cheap :D

Reply on news.ycombinator.com