Depending on your market, only a small minority are driven to invest the energy (time is money) required to get no-cost software - paying someone to have a ready-to-go package is simply more efficient.
Depending on your market, only a small minority are driven to invest the energy (time is money) required to get no-cost software - paying someone to have a ready-to-go package is simply more efficient.
(1) The core problem are professional "free-riders" -- Linux distributions being the main candidates. As soon as they include his software in their repositories, his sales will probably stop to increase.
(2) For Linux distributions, it's also hard to make ready-to-go packages. Looking at his download page, there's no sign whether his package installs properly. Can I even use it? Is it RPM or DEP? Or some sort of .run package that needs to be made executable, first?
(3) Expensive software is unlikely to be sold under an Open Source license: think dental office billing systems, for example. Everything more expensive than, say, $25 will make people get the software elsewhere or use the source.
Nevertheless, I agree that selling open source software may provide some benefits for the seller.
2. I don't yet have official packaging yet for Linux, but I plan to start with Ubuntu and Debian debs when I do. Right now it's just a tarball.
3. You're probably right that expensive software is going to be a harder sell when the source code is available for free. When I wrote the article, I had end-user software in mind, which generally isn't that expensive.
You know, I'm glad you submitted your post here. I'm currently working on an article about a similiar topic. The discussion has been very helpful.
Would you mind if I contact you directly using your support E-Mail adress? I'd be really interested in your feedback.