[flagged]
Or perhaps you should develop critical thinking skills and not read the "rocket man bad" takes on Elon.
What actually happened was that service in that cell had always been off and SpaceX refused to turn it on as doing so specifically for an attack would (obviously) make them party to that attack. It would also not be in line with US policy as they too had, until recently, refused to provide guided weapons with the kind of range that such an attack would've had.
https://www.engadget.com/ukrainian-official-claims-elon-musk...
Similarly, the reporting about the first time was misleading too, as the 1300 terminals that CNN reported on were ones supplied and paid for by the UK, which Ukraine and UK had agreed to stop paying for (because there were ~22k other terminals directly supported by SpaceX) and Ukraine had replaced them with other functional terminals before their service ended.
During WW2 the Danish resistance killed more Danish informants than German occupation forces.
https://youtu.be/ILgSesWMUEI?feature=shared
Having people who are willing to think critically about escalating conflicts, especially civilians who are not fighting in a war, is what we need more of.
If Russia launches a full scale invasion of the US, then Congress can declare war and it will be a completely different story.
Trained people trusted by the command structure with their role. Not rando civilians. If we knew we had a stooge in Pyongyang, it would massively increase the chances of a conflict with them.