If I had to guess, I would bet that the constraints are more commercial than physical... hybrids are already very efficient, so the market for such a vehicle would probably not justify the engineering costs. But that's just a guess!
If I had to guess, I would bet that the constraints are more commercial than physical... hybrids are already very efficient, so the market for such a vehicle would probably not justify the engineering costs. But that's just a guess!
The bigger difference between locomotive applications and GPs question is around charging batteries as opposed to running motors or directly turning the wheels. Efficiency of the smaller turbine is mentioned in another comment - but I have to imagine you'd also see some loses going from turbine to generator to battery and then to electric motor.
In terms of efficiency losses between the turbine, generator, battery, and motor - no, not really; look at most modern hybrid cars.
Lithium ion battery coulombic efficiency is in the high 90's percentage-wise, by the way.
I would imagine that we might see hybrid turbine locomotives as battery power density and cost continue to improve.