Hacker News Reader

> only using the reference after it has been invalidated can cause language-level UB.

When a reference is 'used' is much broader than you might expect; https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52898 is a SIGILL from merely creating a null reference, never 'using' it.

View on HN

That's not about 'using' a reference, it's about constructing an invalid value – no different than doing transmute::<u32,char>(0x110000). See https://www.ralfj.de/blog/2020/07/15/unused-data.html for an explanation why it's UB.

That's true, but the claim was "it's ok to extend the lifetime of a reference beyond its referent so long as you don't use it after its referent has ceased being live"; what definition of 'used' the compiler might rely on is relevant.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com