I don't accept this premise and I don't think serves as a reasonable excuse for government interference in labor markets. Even if you do accept this, then the solution sacrifices long-term labor stability for short-term labor monopolization.
Either way, I don't see this as a positive outcome, and I regret every administrations attempt to expand the program using any excuse that happens across their desks.
> but how many times do we have to learn the lesson that “more people making software leads to more software jobs”
The connection between this outcome and increased H1-B visas for mostly _corporate sponsors_ is sketchy, at best.