I have absolutely no idea what these guys are all talking about. 15 years ago, when I was considering buying a cell phone in high school, I was looking at $40/mo for calls and texts, no data, and all sorts of crazy roaming things. Now I pay $25/mo, get subsidized smart phones, price includes fees and taxes, 50GB of data across the 4 participants in my plan, weird random freebees, etc. etc. And I'm way less price-conscious now than I was then. This lawsuit complains about something that bears no relation to reality, AFAICT.

Sounds like AT&T and Verizon people should go to T-Mobile if their service is so expensive.

Same here. There is even a new $10/mo variant that is still plenty for me.