So any source that's ever been wrong is not credible?
What infallible sources or publications are you relying on?
I think the more productive question is to ask: how many times can you cry wolf before you lose a grade of credibility?
when a group stops large disclosed retractions and starts publishing the retraction somewhere in the Sports Section -- or worse yet : when the retractions stop.
Well, if you uncritically share Nature articles, you're a sucker. It doesn't matter too much to me. Poor choices by others helps me make money.
How does the choice to share Nature articles make you money?
Polymarket.
Fox News
Fox News has never published a retraction?
much like Das Kapital, Gell-Mann Amnesia is sound in its observations, but poor in its conclusions