Which is stronger evidence for humans than "in nowhere".

Ib my younger days I used to get all excitef about new scientific breakthroughs. After decades I know better and apply the heuristic of disregard whenever I come across the hidden punch-line "In mice".

It really is a very good metric for preventing you to get sucked into hype that will 99.99 percent of the time result in exactly zero real world impact 10 years later.

This is the stupidest glib reply format on par with “citation needed” and “tell me you’re [thing] without telling me you’re [thing]”

Animal models are used in research. Is this news to you? Do you think people don’t know that?

Yes but we have to start somewhere.

And not just any mice; specially bred mice.

So it's not even generalizable to all mice, much less humans.

More studies are needed.