https://www.independent.com/2022/07/27/mixed-reviews-ucsb-mu...
It's no puff piece, and students aren't uniformly positive, but it's a reminder that there are many trade-offs in life, and some are pretty open to it
https://www.independent.com/2022/07/27/mixed-reviews-ucsb-mu...
It's no puff piece, and students aren't uniformly positive, but it's a reminder that there are many trade-offs in life, and some are pretty open to it
It does have positive quotes from a number of people on the UCSB payroll who would never live there.
> . “On the one hand, it’s really nice,” said McCarthy, who lived in the “funky” Santa Rosa Residence Hall his freshman year. “It’s indisputable. There are all sorts of features — air conditioning, game rooms, balconies, flat-screen TVs in every suite — that would make it the nicest dorm on campus.” He also appreciated the project’s bike-friendly infrastructure
The common retort is that it's the rich people's money so that they should be able to impose whatever living conditions they want on the deprived.
In this case, Munger proposed an efficient donation (in his mind) to help the most students possible with his donation and the university accepted.
Since only billionaires are likely to donate buildings, I think it’s going to be common to have donors influence the design.
I think that forcing unreasonable actions as a condition of charity is bad.
Being forced to live without windows because it makes a billionaire happy seems pretty demeaning (and unreasonable) to me.