I don't think I understand. Are you saying that any electric vehicle is by (your) definition not a truck?
Does any established definition of the word "truck" agree with you?
Does any established definition of the word "truck" agree with you?
obviously it can meet a wikipedia definition, that doesn't really matter too much to me though.
you're deliberately focusing on the phrasing instead of the substance of my post so you don't have to talk about my point.
I think gating the definition of "truck" behind "not electric" is stupid, which is what I thought you were doing (and to be honest, your comment is worded to make that a reasonable interpretation); but if you just meant "these trucks are stupid and don't do what I need a truck to do" then I can't disagree.
I one day hope that EV trucks will be useful to me to replace my ICE truck, but for me none of them hit the boxes.
some of them are logistical in relation to charging vs having an extra can of gas though, so it's hard to say.
You're going to say "I wasn't trying to be" yet your rhetoric above contradicts that.
don't worry, I don't have the power to change definitions, you can rest at ease.