That's already happening in USA.
https://www.reliasmedia.com/articles/13807-cleveland-clinic-...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5788708/
And perhaps baselessly, not just testing for tobacco, but any form of nicotine.
I am not saying the fentanyl should be made legal, but its criminalization is a big part of the problem. It is also why it is used so much over other, less risky opioids. Because it is so potent, only small quantities are needed, which makes trafficking easier.
On the other hand, look at cigarettes - everyone agrees they are very bad for you, the packages say it, and you pay an extremely high premium for them over their costs. But no one dies from fentanyl (or whatever) in them because they're a regulated industry. We used to know less about it and let people smoke as much as they want. Now that we have good data on that we raise the social and financial cost of cigarettes to keep them as unpopular as possible.
I'd encourage you to think about this less like eggs and more like the weather. On some level, drugs exist "out there" and people will use them "sometimes." We can't change that. What we can change are the systems that make the already difficult problem of addiction worse by introducing lethal surprises.
It's worked out that way in a lot of US states for weed -- the illegal stuff is still around and still cheaper. I read recently that in California, illegal weed is still 75% of the market.
If you're already happy with your friendly neighborhood plug, why change?
I found the the article I mentioned:
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2022-05-22/legal-weed-...
Not exactly encouraging new businesses, but to still go from 0 to 25% that’s not too bad