Worth reading the complaint if you want to hear what he did:
https://www.cohenmilstein.com/wp-content/uploads/site/2022.0...
Worth reading the complaint if you want to hear what he did:
https://www.cohenmilstein.com/wp-content/uploads/site/2022.0...
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2020/09/nikola-admits-prototype...
"An investigator sent to the exact site used by Nikola for their video tested the hill in an SUV by parking the vehicle at the top, then rolling from neutral. He was able to hit a top speed of 56 mph and rolled for approximately 2.1 miles."
As part of refuting the Hindenburg claims, Nikola said:
"Nikola never stated its truck was driving under its own propulsion in the video."
I don't personally believe people should do this, but it is a mantra often thrown around.
This is fundamentally lying to investors when you have a fiduciary responsibility beyond your own enrichment.
This isn’t some suggestion either, but law. Obviously we can debate the effectiveness of the law. But generally you are expected to “be square” in your dealings.
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/fiduciary-responsibi...
For example, when puffing up one’s CV, one could probably get away with making an actual accomplishment seem more important than it is. However, if they were to make up the accomplishment whole-cloth, the that would cross a line.
That's why this gets prosecuted fairly quickly, while corporations regularly committing fraud against consumers remain in business for decades.
In short, the VectoIQ Board simply failed to look under the hood at Nikola—both figuratively and literally—completely abdicating their responsibilities to VectoIQ’s stockholders.
"2,670-acre Riverbend Ranch, which includes a 16,800-square-foot mansion along the Weber River"